Embracing the African American heritage, culture, strength, and their indomitable spirit 365 days a year
Menu
Norris v. Alabama
Background
At the Scottsboro, Alabama Courthouse in April 1931, Clarence Norris and eight other African American boys were indicted for rape in Jackson County, Alabama in March 1931. Without proper counsel, their trials took only four days and all were found guilty. Eight were convicted and Norris’s conviction was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Alabama. The youngest of the boys received life in prison. The Norris v. Alabama, was the second decision of the U.S Supreme Court in the Scottsboro Boys rape cases.
In Powell v. Alabama (1932), the Court reversed the convictions of Black youths sentenced to death by the Alabama courts. The defendants, who lacked effective assistance of counsel, had not received a fair trial as mandated by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Scottsboro cases were then retried by the Alabama authorities. One of the defendants, Clarence Norris, was again sentenced to death. The defense counsel alleged that African-Americans had been systematically excluded from the grand jury that indicted Norris and from the trial jury that convicted him.
The Alabama Supreme Court upheld the lower court verdict. On appeal the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the Alabama Supreme Court decision. Speaking for the Court, Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes held that the systematic exclusion of African-Americans from service on the grand and trial juries denied African-American defendants in the state courts the equal protection of law guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. Since the defense had adduced convincing evidence that Blacks had been systematically excluded from service on the grand jury, the Court reversed the conviction.
The Supreme Court’s decision in Norris v. Alabama highlighted the unconstitutional nature of racial discrimination in jury selection. This ruling was a significant step towards addressing racial inequality in the justice system. It would take several more decades and additional legal battles to further challenge and dismantle discriminatory practices in the United States.